Pressure from all sides of a business’s value chain is mounting. Governments are tightening regulations, suppliers are increasing their sustainable product offerings, consumers are demanding greener products, and green investors are gaining influence. This growing importance is reflected in the fact that 70% of business leaders say climate change will impact their business strategy within the next three years (2024).
Yet, despite widespread commitment to sustainability, the data tells a different story. A recent analysis revealed that only one in six of businesses are actually on track to meet their net-zero targets.
This raises the question: With sustainability becoming imperative for businesses and many companies embedding it into their corporate strategies, what is standing in the way of real progress?
Many businesses understand the advantages of incorporating sustainable practices—compliance benefits, enhanced reputation, operational efficiencies—yet they still struggle to translate their sustainability goals into real action. This leaves many falling into the Green Gap; a term that refers to the disconnect between recognising the importance of sustainability and taking tangible steps to achieve it.
However, the Green Gap is distinct from greenwashing. While greenwashing refers to misleading sustainability claims, the Green Gap highlights genuine barriers that prevent businesses from implementing sustainability initiatives effectively. Traditionally associated with consumer behaviour, this concept now reflects the challenges modern businesses face in achieving their sustainability goals.
Depending on your position in the value chain, you’ve likely encountered discussions around eco-premiums or eco-penalties when considering sustainable goods. The idea that “eco” products come at a higher price has been ingrained since the rise of the green movement in the 1970s. Even today, this perception persists, with tech mogul Bill Gates coining the term “Green Premium” in 2020, highlighting the need to reduce the additional costs of sustainable alternatives to drive accessibility.
While 42% of businesses rank climate change as a significant concern, commercial viability remains a top priority, with economic outlook ranking as the most significant concern at 44% (2024). Traditional infrastructure was built on cheap, exploitative production methods, allowing for mass commercialism at low costs. By contrast, sustainable products often involve different production processes, ethical sourcing, and quality improvements, leading to a reported 75-85% price increase on average for sustainable alternatives.
However, sustainability can drive long-term cost savings. Many eco-friendly products last longer, improve energy efficiency, reduce waste, and enhance brand value. They also prepare businesses for future legislative changes and supply chain disruptions. But the reality remains - for businesses lacking upfront capital, making the transition can be a challenge, particularly when compounded by economic pressures such as rising National Insurance Contributions (NIC) and inflation.
The Cost vs. Benefit Debate:
Even businesses that successfully integrate sustainability into their operations face another challenge: the risk of greenwashing. In 2021, the International Consumer Protection Enforcement Network (ICPEN) conducted a global review of nearly 500 websites marketing environmentally branded goods and services. Their findings were concerning: 40% of companies lacked evidence for their claims, used unaccredited eco-logos, or hid critical information about their sustainability practices.
This highlights the high probability of businesses unintentionally falling into the greenwashing trap, whether through vague language, misleading certifications, or exaggerated sustainability claims.
The barriers to sustainability, whether cost concerns, economic uncertainty, or the risk of greenwashing, are real and pose challenges for many businesses. But businesses are no longer asking if sustainability is worth pursuing; instead, they’re asking how to integrate it effectively.
To close the Green Gap, businesses must:
Sustainability shouldn’t have to cost the earth, or businesses. It’s an ongoing strategy that requires a holistic yet targeted approach. By focusing on long-term sustainability and wider support, businesses can drive both environmental and commercial success.